A lakh is equal to 100,000, one tenth of one million, or 105.[1][2] It is used in the Indian naming system. 100 lakh is one crore. Larger numbers are sometimes combinations of both, a lakh crore for example equal to one trillion. 1000 lakh is one myllion in the myriad system.
Nirvana Supermind calls this number Two-ex-grand zeroogol or quinol , and it's equal to Q<10,grand zeroogol> = Q<10,5,1> in Quick array notation[3].
Aarex Tiaokhiao calls this number qoonol, 5-noogol[4], or goonaoltrult, and it's equal to a(10,100,0)x[3] in Aarex's Array Notation.[5]
Username5243 calls this number niloogolduplex or gooqnol, and it's equal to 10[1]5 in Username5243's Array Notation.[6]
Wikia user NumLynx gave the name pentaplex for this number, coined in analogy to pentalogue. [7]
DeepLineMadom calls the number boogolduplex, boomyrol, and troopol, and is equal to 10[2]10[2]10[2]100 = 10[3]5 in DeepLineMadom's Array Notation.[8][9] It is not to be confused with the much larger Bowers' boogolduplex, which is {10,10,{10,10,{10,10,100}}} in BEAF.
In the German language, 100,000 is sometimes called "Zehntelmillion".
[]
Some currencies, such as the Indonesian rupiah and the Vietnamese đồng, have banknotes with this number in the denomination.
It was also the prize for correctly answering the first question in the Italian game show Chi vuol essere miliardario? in Italian lire.
Furthermore, it was also the prize for correctly answering the first five questions in the Japanese game show Quiz $ Millionaire in Japanese yen.
In politics[]
In Germany, municipalities with at least 100,000 inhabitants are called Großstadt.
Approximations[]
| Notation | Lower bound | Upper bound |
|---|---|---|
| Scientific notation | \(1\times10^5\) | |
| Arrow notation | \(10\uparrow5\) | |
| Steinhaus-Moser Notation | 6[3] | 7[3] |
| Copy notation | 9[5] | 1[6] |
| Taro's multivariable Ackermann function | A(3,13) | A(3,14) |
| Pound-Star Notation | #*(32)*3 | #*(2)*13 |
| BEAF | {10,5} | |
| Hyper-E notation | E5 | |
| Bashicu matrix system | (0)[316] | (0)[317] |
| Hyperfactorial array notation | 8! | 4!1 |
| Fast-growing hierarchy | \(f_2(12)\) | \(f_2(13)\) |
| Hardy hierarchy | \(H_{\omega^2}(12)\) | \(H_{\omega^2}(13)\) |
| Slow-growing hierarchy | \(g_{\omega^5}(10)\) | |
Sources[]
- ↑ Conway and Guy. The Book of Numbers. Copernicus. 1995. ISBN 978-0387979939 p.16
- ↑ [1]
- ↑ Numbers from quick array notation
- ↑ Part 1 (LAN) - Aarex Googology[dead link]
- ↑ AAN Numbers - P1 - Aarex Googology[dead link]
- ↑ Part 1 - My Large Numbers
- ↑ -plex numbers. Retrieved 2021-11-21.
- ↑ DeepLineMadom's googology - Numbers I've coined (Retrieved 4 May 2022)
- ↑ Pointless Googolplex Stuffs - DLMAN Part 1 (retrieved 9 November 2024)
See also[]
2-entry series: Zero-quinvicenol · Zeroogol · Grand zeroogol · Two-ex-grand zeroogol · Three-ex-grand zeroogol · Four-ex-grand zeroogol · Five-ex-grand zeroogol · Six-ex-grand zeroogol · Seven-ex-grand zeroogol · Eight-ex-grand zeroogol · Nine-ex-grand zeroogol · Zero-unol · Zero-binol
Indian counting system: Lakh · Crore · Padma · Tallakshana · Ogha · Ababa · Atata · Sogandhika · Uppala · Dvajagravati · Kumuda · Pundarika · Paduma · Kathana · Mahakathana · Asankhyeya · Dvajagranisamani · Vahanaprajnapti · Inga · Kuruta · Sarvanikshepa · Agrasara · Uttaraparamanurajahpravesa · Avatamsaka Sutra · Nirabhilapya nirabhilapya parivarta · Jaghanya Parīta Asaṃkhyāta
Chinese, Japanese and Korean counting system: Wan · Yi · Zhao · Jing · Gai · Zi · Rang · Gou · Jian · Zheng · Zai · Ji · Gougasha · Asougi · Nayuta · Fukashigi · Muryoutaisuu
See also: Template:Googology in Japan
Note: The readers should be careful that numbers defined by Username5243's Array Notation are ill-defined as explained in Username5243's Array Notation#Issues. So, when an article refers to a number defined by the notation, it actually refers to an intended value, not an actual value itself (for example, a[c]b = \(a \uparrow^c b\) in arrow notation). In addition, even if the notation is ill-defined, a class category should be based on an intended value when listed, not an actual value itself, as it is not hard to fix all the issues from the original definition, hence it should not be removed.