just delete this page kyodai Tamatak 'v chamatak ki (talk) 07:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- It will be deleted if no one disagrees. That is how the deletion template works. 🐟 Fish fish fish ... 🐠 08:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I disagree with removal.[]
The number isn't irrational, and was mentioned by and coined by real googologists with a real source. I see no issue with making an exception and keeping it. {Message from AlexJN.} (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- You are right. It is a rational number. I was confused when I put the tag. I remove the tag. 🐟 Fish fish fish ... 🐠 14:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
In my opinion the policy seems unfair because it only concerns irrational numbers less than 100 and not useless random rational numbers like this, maybe the policy can be changed to numbers where \(10^{-2} < x < 10^{2}, x \notin \mathbb{N}\) should not be on the wiki, does anyone agree? Tamatak 'v chamatak ki (talk) 09:36, 17 September 2024 (UTC)