What's wrong with adding pictures?[]
What's wrong with adding a picture of Amedeo Avogadro on the article about Avogadro's number/constant? It's related to the article, albeit loosely. There are some even more loosely related images around here, such as a picture of roast beef on Bowers Exploding Array Function, and a picture of a tree that has been eaten by a beaver on busy beaver function. Also, the picture is used on the Wikipedia article for Amedeo Avogadro, and it's in the public domain because its copyright has expired, so there's no problem with our license. -- ☁ I want more clouds! ⛅ 14:19, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
- Although I share the doubts about appropriateness of the more loosely related images, I feel like a picture of Avogadro won't hurt anyone. I'd say this one should come back. I wonder what Aarex's view on this is. LittlePeng9 (talk) 15:09, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
Yea,the first time I added this picture ,he removed it and I asked Aarex on his talk page about it.He said it was "off topic".
One month later I added it again,because I thought he had changed his mind about it,since he wrote "I'll check that",which realy confused me.
Now he deleted it again....Boboris02 (talk) 15:33, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
This is not a problem with the picture. Aarex, just because you think something should be a ccertain way, does not mean everyone else does. He also marked the pages that the 84.whatever (I forget the number) IP user was making because of "no sources" when he could have found a source and added it. Aarex, next time, ask before you delete it. Username5243 (talk) 19:31, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
- Deal. AarexWikia04 - 19:34, November 3, 2016 (UTC)
No deal!
JK.
To be more serious, I put it back. If you revert it I will notify the admins so this doesn't become an edit war. Username5243 (talk) 19:36, November 3, 2016 (UTC)